<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are YOU to Blame for Your Stalker?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://erinmcmahon.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/are-you-to-blame-for-your-stalker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://erinmcmahon.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/are-you-to-blame-for-your-stalker/</link>
	<description>Social Media, Marketing, teh Interwebs, Nonprofit and Other Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: firestar9s</title>
		<link>http://erinmcmahon.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/are-you-to-blame-for-your-stalker/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>firestar9s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erinmcmahon.wordpress.com/?p=72#comment-35</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Chris, it is easier to protect yourself virtually than physically, I hadn&#039;t considered that. But I&#039;m still not convinced that that makes the victim first to blame for being socially stalked. Or is that still what you&#039;re saying? (I don&#039;t want to misinterpret...)

(No worries about the old comment! Thanks for getting it posted in the end!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Chris, it is easier to protect yourself virtually than physically, I hadn&#8217;t considered that. But I&#8217;m still not convinced that that makes the victim first to blame for being socially stalked. Or is that still what you&#8217;re saying? (I don&#8217;t want to misinterpret&#8230;)</p>
<p>(No worries about the old comment! Thanks for getting it posted in the end!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Miller</title>
		<link>http://erinmcmahon.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/are-you-to-blame-for-your-stalker/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erinmcmahon.wordpress.com/?p=72#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Great feedback!  I hinted that the person sharing too much was first to blame, not final for sure.  But one thing is different in your anology, in the social networking world you have the digital ability to quickly lock yourself down and stop the attack.  Yes, there will still be ways, but it is far simpler to protect virtually then physically.

But great feedback, sorry the comment got sent to spam (that was fixed by coComment).  Also, you might want to see the new site my wife and I started that started by working with schools and has now started to expand
http://SocialStalking.com

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great feedback!  I hinted that the person sharing too much was first to blame, not final for sure.  But one thing is different in your anology, in the social networking world you have the digital ability to quickly lock yourself down and stop the attack.  Yes, there will still be ways, but it is far simpler to protect virtually then physically.</p>
<p>But great feedback, sorry the comment got sent to spam (that was fixed by coComment).  Also, you might want to see the new site my wife and I started that started by working with schools and has now started to expand<br />
<a href="http://SocialStalking.com" rel="nofollow">http://SocialStalking.com</a></p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
